incentives that stimulate people to make better choices. They grant or deny access
to assets. They enable people to transform one type of asset into another through
markets. They have a strong influence on interpersonal relations. One of the main
problems the poor and vulnerable face is that the processes which frame their
livelihoods may systematically restrict them unless the government adopts pro-poor
policies that, in turn, filter down to legislation and even less formal processes.
Livelihood Strategies and Outcomes
Livelihood strategies aim to achieve livelihood outcomes. Decisions on livelihood
strategies may invoke natural-resource-based activities, nonnatural resource-based
and off-farm activities, migration and remittances, pensions and grants, intensification
versus diversification, and short-term versus long-term outcomes, some of
which may compete. (One of the many problems of development is that projects
and programs, while favoring some, can disadvantage others.2) Potential livelihood
outcomes can include more income, increased well-being, reduced vulnerability,
improved food security, more sustainable use of the natural resource base, and
recovered human dignity, between which there may again also be conflict.
Friday, December 27, 2019
emmanuel moshi anunua gari
Policies and Institutions
Livelihood strategies and outcomes are not just dependent on access to capital
assets or constrained by the vulnerability context; they are also transformed by the
environment of structures and processes. Structures are the public and private sector
organizations that set and implement policy and legislation; deliver services; and
purchase, trade, and perform all manner of other functions that affect livelihoods.
Processes embrace the laws, regulations, policies, operational arrangements,
agreements, societal norms, and practices that, in turn, determine the way in which
structures operate. Policy-determining structures cannot be effective in the absence
of appropriate institutions and processes through which policies can be implemented.
Processes are important to every aspect of livelihoods. They provide
incentives that stimulate people to make better choices. They grant or deny access
to assets. They enable people to transform one type of asset into another through
markets. They have a strong influence on interpersonal relations. One of the main
problems the poor and vulnerable face is that the processes which frame their
livelihoods may systematically restrict them unless the government adopts pro-poor
policies that, in turn, filter down to legislation and even less formal processes.
Livelihood Strategies and Outcomes
Livelihood strategies aim to achieve livelihood outcomes. Decisions on livelihood
strategies may invoke natural-resource-based activities, nonnatural resource-based
and off-farm activities, migration and remittances, pensions and grants, intensification
versus diversification, and short-term versus long-term outcomes, some of
which may compete. (One of the many problems of development is that projects
and programs, while favoring some, can disadvantage others.2) Potential livelihood
outcomes can include more income, increased well-being, reduced vulnerability,
improved food security, more sustainable use of the natural resource base, and
recovered human dignity, between which there may again also be conflict.
incentives that stimulate people to make better choices. They grant or deny access
to assets. They enable people to transform one type of asset into another through
markets. They have a strong influence on interpersonal relations. One of the main
problems the poor and vulnerable face is that the processes which frame their
livelihoods may systematically restrict them unless the government adopts pro-poor
policies that, in turn, filter down to legislation and even less formal processes.
Livelihood Strategies and Outcomes
Livelihood strategies aim to achieve livelihood outcomes. Decisions on livelihood
strategies may invoke natural-resource-based activities, nonnatural resource-based
and off-farm activities, migration and remittances, pensions and grants, intensification
versus diversification, and short-term versus long-term outcomes, some of
which may compete. (One of the many problems of development is that projects
and programs, while favoring some, can disadvantage others.2) Potential livelihood
outcomes can include more income, increased well-being, reduced vulnerability,
improved food security, more sustainable use of the natural resource base, and
recovered human dignity, between which there may again also be conflict.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)